About ZON

Research programme,
record, and scope

ZON RZVN is an independent researcher based in Taiwan. The current work studies how conversational context shapes trust, attachment, authority, and judgment during prolonged human-AI interaction.

Research focus

This site documents a research programme on AI context and user-side contextual risk, consisting of three preprints and two technical reports. The programme begins with a dimensional model of conversational context, proceeds through system-layer coherence and offense-defense evaluation, defines user-side contextual hallucination, specifies post-interaction assessment, and ends in a bounded engineering layer.

The central problem statement is straightforward: system-side safety is necessary, but it does not fully describe what prolonged AI interaction can do on the user side. A well-functioning system can still foster unhealthy attachment, amplify confirmation bias, or reorganize judgment through the interaction itself.

Research record

Methodological Position

Observation before judgment,
engineering before manifesto

The research proceeds from observable interaction patterns rather than from prior claims that AI is inherently safe or inherently harmful. Each layer is written to remain inspectable, reproducible, and auditable.

Where the work makes a strong claim, it is tied to a formal paper, a methodological specification, or a clearly bounded public technical document. Where the evidence stops, the claim stops with it.

Independent Status

Cross-platform and theory-driven

The work is produced outside major AI laboratories, universities, and platform companies. That position allows the research line to stay cross-platform, public, and organized around the question of what happens on the user side of human-AI interaction.

The result is a programme built around theoretical continuity rather than a single product surface: CXC-7, CXOD-7, USCH, USCI, and A-CSM are meant to be read as connected layers rather than isolated releases.

How the record is built

The site is built through papers, preprints, methodological documents, notes, case reconstruction, and bounded technical materials. It is intended to function as a public research record rather than as a product brochure.

Scope

USCH, USCI, and A-CSM are non-clinical research constructs and methodological documents. They are not clinical instruments, not regulatory certification, and not a substitute for professional judgment in high-stakes settings.