A vocabulary for user side risk in long term AI dialogue.
The corpus is a 20-month first-person longitudinal record: 3,928 conversations and 215,949 message nodes. The method is an exploratory single-case longitudinal qualitative design with a hybrid deductive-reflexive thematic approach.
Six public frameworks
USCP User Side Contextual Phenomena
The parent framework of the fourteen phenomena. Three constructs: contextual projection, contextual attachment, contextual authority transfer. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21346372
CXOD-7 + Coh(G)
System side contextual offense, defense and coherence. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17136789
CXC-7 Conversational Context, Seven Dimensions
Context conditions, role relations, memory illusions, goal drift and safety boundaries. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17247637
USCH User Side Contextual Hallucination
The early framework of user side contextual drift. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.6135732
USCI User Side Contextual Interaction Assessment
Turns the phenomena into an operational review and documentation method. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18678196
A-CSM AI Contextual Signal Matrix
An executable research prototype. The public core is open source. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19097266
Always cite the concept DOI. It resolves to the latest version. The full list is on the Work page.
Three methodological commitments
A-CSM: AI Contextual Signal Matrix
Pipeline: rule-based triage, a three-family LLM judge panel, deterministic citation alignment, deterministic aggregation, USCI hard rules, and a PDF/A-3b report. The report embeds the de-identified source, each judge's raw output and a SHA-256 manifest, so a third party can re-verify from the report alone.
Status: an executable research prototype. The public core is open source and under active development.
Evidence level statement
This research is currently a descriptive phenomenon framework built on a single first-person longitudinal corpus. It offers observable phenomenon categories and a reading method. It has not been validated across samples and is not a diagnostic instrument.
The USCH six-stage model and self-assessment scale have been retracted and are no longer cited on this site. See Research Boundaries.
Research vocabulary and service vocabulary
The risk is already on official lists
This mapping locates the risk. It is not an endorsement by any institution. The lineage goes back to Parasuraman and Riley (1997). The contribution here is evidence, method and tooling.
Datasets and archiving (not papers)
These are dataset and archiving records, listed separately from the papers.